Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Alternate Realities

Have you ever thought that a blog could be more than just an update of someone's daily life, or a political opinion, or any other left-brain expression? What if a blog could emanate from the right brain? I think about it all the time. In fact, I've thought about it since I first encountered the medium nearly 10 years ago, and I've experimented with it. In fact, I continue to experiment with it. I envision spaces on the web that make us reach beyond ourselves like literature does. Spaces where we explore the world of mind (not thoughts, mind you), a world where intuition creates the reality and invites readers into alternate universes which, in the world of literature are called "fiction".

Would you feel betrayed if you discovered you were reading the words of a character rather than an actual person? If so, why? Especially if they'd shown you things you'd never seen and had expanded your personal boundaries. Would you resent Anna Karenina, Elinor Dashwood, Mrs. Dalloway, or Huckleberry Finn if you'd first met them on a blog, only to discover they were characters and not actual people living in the Midwest or England?

The brain does not differentiate between real and imagined events. Imagine that! In your brain, you've actually flown on Eagles' wings with Hobbits! You've floated down the Mississippi on a raft and you've fought alongside King Arthur! How marvelous is that!

The problem is, most people are programed (or choose) to be literal beings. Or at least that's what they've become in the black and white "real" world that the establishment defends, sometimes to the death. I've always pushed these boundaries and I've never hesitated to share what I've discovered. We are not flesh and blood. We are pure spirit, although we're driving these flesh and blood automobiles around for now. It won't last. Meantime, we're here to learn, and reading blogs is an excellent way to learn about other people, their experiences, cultures, pain, and joy. Yes, there's a place for the left-brain blog--we need that connection with reality--but we need fantasy as well. What I envision are spaces where we get our daily dose of imagination as well.

I think that a blog can be a book. Notice that I didn't say LIKE a book, where you read an online doc file. I think that a blog can BE a book, where the story takes place in real time. How many times have you read a wonderful story, only to dread having to say goodbye to the characters when you finished it? What if you could meet those characters on a blog, where they speak for themselves without the stranglehold of plot, form, and the constraint of linear, numbered time/pages? What if you could read the story as it happens through the characters' thoughts, not as an observer through an observer?

It might be pretty cool.

I believe that what we call "blogging" will not die. I think that it is--like any new form of communication--in its embryonic stage and that it will evolve just as literature and art have evolved. It will have to, or it will die.

23 comments:

Alan said...

I think that most people out there won't get what you are proposing. Which is not to say that you shouldn't propose it -- most ideas that bring significant change possesses this quality. Rock on.

Alan said...

Did I really just say "rock on"?

Shit.

Merisi said...

Fiction and reality,
I sometimes wonder where the one ends and the other begins.
Am I awake or am I dreaming?

Steph said...

Alan: Yeah, I know. But people get weird.

Merisi: "Last night I dreamed I was a butterfly, and now I do not know if I am a man who dreamed he was a butterfly, or a butterfly now dreaming I am a man." Lao Tsu

Rab said...

Considering that the personas people present to us in everyday life are so often contrivances, I would not hold a "persona" blog against the blogger. Two exceptions might be:

1. A marketer who fakes a blog to sell products (in my opinion, they would be scheming to part people with their money, and violating the reader's trust). Of course, that has been done (All I want for Christmas is a PSP... etc.).

2. A person who takes an opposite opinion to their own and blogs for the purpose of weakening the opposing side's arguments (by being stupid, abrasive, or whatever). Guerrilla warfare in physical space is one thing, but I prefer that a dialectic be resolved honorably.

But really, consider what anyone is or is not willing to post to their blog. To some extent, what you read is always from a character, controlled by what the writer has learned is safe to reveal to others. Sometimes that character is more true than the one we present in physical space, but it will never reveal everything. That might not make it fiction, per se, but neither can we assume the text is objectively "true." (if we all agree, it is intersubjectively true... and if they believe what they write it is subjectively true.)

Tolkein, by the way, is a good example of someone who believed that some truths are better revealed through epic. That is why he endeavored to write the Lord of the Rings trilogy, the Silmarillion, &c. In his lifetime he was famous as a scholar of Beowulf and other early English epics; how many people have read his essays as compared to his fantasy epics?

Back to the contrivance theory, just recall the people you have known who pretend at piety, and yet terrorize their children on nights at home. Those are the fakes; and my blessing on the others if they want to fictionalize their blog.

I hope you were looking for the long answer...

So, are you going to make another blog? ;)

david mcmahon said...

Now you've really got me thinking ....

Young said...

I just love what you wrote.
I believe that people needs fantasy because it makes them hope, have faith to what they believe in but not too much of it.

If people don't fantasize, they'll be depressed because a lot of people are expecting a lot of things and reality is not going to meet all of them.

Whether we like it or not in this lifetime, we are only going to get the things we need and deserve but apart from the things we want for ourselves, we won't get it.

That's why there is a saying "to be happy expect less."

Another thing is if I met a person who created a persona who isn't real, I wouldn't resent or be angry with him for what he did unless he did it to patronize, manipulate, and take advantage of other people.

I think those unreal creations are the person's way of trying to express the person that he wants to be, other do it as an outlet because they simply don't have the voice to what they think and feel, some does it to express their point of views that are rejected strongly, etc. There are lots of reasons why people do that.

Merisi said...

Thank you, Steph,
sums it up much better than I ever could! :-)

Would you feel betrayed if you discovered you were reading the words of a character rather than an actual person?
I have been thinking about your question: I'd say that I'd expect to be told that I am reading the adventures of a fictional character. Unless that fictional character is so obviously fictional that even I would understand it without being told, a long dead poet, for example. ;-)

There have been a few scandals lately, regarding non-fiction accounts that turned out to be, at least in part, fictional.

B.E. Earl said...

I'd say a certain RW (or Keifer or Emo) would definitely agree with you.

Me too.

Lynette said...

Personally, I think it's none of my business who that character is--fictional or non-fictional. People assume all sorts of identites on line and it's really none of my business unless they're trying to deceive me in order to take advantage of me or hurt me in some way.

Kiefer and Emo said...

Exactly right.

We're tired of Erma Bombeck clones prattling on about their suburban lives. Why can't blog entries be working metaphors for things? Who says it has to go on and on about someone's three year old or that you have to explain in your profile exactly who you are? Just because a person can string sentences together doesn't make them a writer.

The problem is that it seems most blog audiences really don't want to be challenged. Ask a random sampling of people who Ann Quin is and see what you get. I am finding out that the vast majority of connections I've made online with my "regular" blog don't want anything at all to do with the one that tries to push the envelope a little and challenge some assumptions. They stay away in droves even when they find out who is behind it.

Why? Not because they're stupid, but because they want that internet-discussion board thing where they can thumb things up or down and weigh in with an opinion. I feel that's what the bulk of blogs do. I'm not saying that is bad.

Yes I am.

No I'm not...

Steph said...

Rab: No, I'm not suggesting deceit in any sense, but real-time fiction. Theater, if you will. I've read many of Tolkien's lesser known works--Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Pearl--I bought his Beowulf, and I think I read it back in the early 80s. I even composed a cantata using his Kortirion Among the Trees. That's a beautiful poem. Thanks for your in depth comment. Insightful! P.S. I already have.

Young, Merisi & Lynette: I think what I'm proposing is something kind of Andy Kaufmanish. He challenged people to think about what is reality and what is not through his, "is this guy for real?" comedy. Of course, he pissed off a lot of people, people who only believe in what they can understand through the physical senses, but the right people got it.

Earl: Precisely!

Kiefer... or Emo: I was wondering when you would show up on this thread. Maybe some of us should start a community blog called Blog Theater, or some such name (since people seem to need to know when they're reading fiction. If there were something like that out there, and it was done well, I'd LOVE it. I'd be a dedicated reader. Again, think Andy Kaufman.

Kiefer and Emo said...

Funny you should mention Andy. You want to see the blog that helped me decide to start blogging myself? It started in 2004.

Look at the comment totals.

Andy Kaufman Returns

JPDeni said...

Maybe some of us should start a community blog called Blog Theater

Theater of the Blog (as in "Theater of the Absurd")
Theater in the Blog (as in "Theater in the Round")
Blogistic Theater (as in "Realistic Theater")

:-)

It really isn't anyone's business who is behind the writing. We've got such a National Enquirer mentality going these days that a lot of people think they are entitled to know every detail about everybody else's life. Privacy is a thing of the past.

In my blog, I open the door however much I want to. And there's lots of different doors from which I can choose. Readers get to choose whether to read or not. If they enjoy reading it, fine. They're welcome. If they don't, they'll go find some other thing to read, which is also fine.

Steph said...

K&E: I'd seen the Kaufman blog some time ago (I think I found a link to it on a blog about a waiter named Vincenzo), but I'd forgotten how good it is. Most of the commenters who say they're huge fans of Kaufman's work haven't a clue. They admire him only if they're not on the receiving end of his comedy-art. Who cares if it's really Kaufman or not? They're missing the entire point.

K&E and Deni: I don't understand the iron persistence people maintain to resist a little reality-expansion. On my Mozart blog I've met all types. Some people concede to the fantasy and have a great time, some people write, "I know this isn't really Mozart!" (Bravo, genius), and some people truly believe. Whatever, I agree that it's up to them if they read it or not, and their inner reaction is their business, not mine. "Don't like it, don't look", as Ville always says.

I also agree that a blogger owes nothing to anyone. If someone feels duped, that tells me more about the reader than it does the blogger.

I wish people could suspend their need for the security of knowing if something is fact or fiction just a little bit. I wish they'd just let down and say, "I don't care if it's real or not. It's a good read!"

Lorna said...

What an interesting person you are.
~Lorna

ArneA said...

Yes, and it will NOT DIE.
Great thoughts.

jinksy said...

Can I direct you to a blog called The Diary Of An Old Fart? I'd be interested to see how you react to that...

GreenJello said...

Fantastic post. Good thinking fodder.

Congrats on POTD!

Steph said...

Lorna: Well...

ArneA: I think it's incredible that people are reading and writing again, people who normally weren't B.B. (Before Blog) -- and on a such a global level. Regardless of what people write about, they're writing, communicating, sharing ideas with people all over the planet. That's very exciting.

Jinksy: Thank you for the tip! I Googled it and started reading immediately. You may not that the page is now in my blogroll. That's exactly what I'm talking about!

GreenJello: Thanks!

Steph said...

Jinksy: I meant "notice" - my brain raced ahead of my fingers...

CrazyCath said...

Interesting thoughts....

Edward Yablonsky said...

I enjoyed what you said about the brain:
The brain does not differentiate between real and imagined events. Imagine that! In your brain, you've actually flown on Eagles' wings with Hobbits! You've floated down the Mississippi on a raft and you've fought alongside King Arthur! How marvelous is that!
I have read that nothing is lost and the Akashic records of which I have read indicate that naught is lost in the sonoforous ether. If only we and our brain power were sensitive enough to access these records. Please visit my little corner of the world:
edwardsliteracylog.blogspot.com