Sometimes, things strike me as very odd. Sometimes, I just stop and think about things that the rest of the world (or most of it anyway) seems to take for granted. Like laughing.
Sometimes, I'll be sitting in a room with my friends and we'll all be laughing and having a good time, and it suddenly occurs to me how weird laughing is.
Or the fact that every single person in the world goes to the toilet and has to use TP. I think of this especially when someone thinks they're really something special and other people worship them. Like celebrities and politicians. Yeah, they all have to use that roll of paper.
But everyone thinks about that stuff anyway, don't they? And this entry is supposed to be about pants.
Sometimes, I wonder why blue jeans have become like part of a uniform all over the world. People wear them day in and day out and they don't even give it a thought. They put them on and head outside where nearly everyone else on the street is wearing them. If everyone all over the world was wearing the same tee shirt, we'd really think about the conformity going on. What makes pants different? And why jeans? They're really not all that comfortable, are they?
Why have I worn jeans since I got my first pair at the age of six? They were those kind with the red plaid flannel lining and the elastic waistband. Do you remember those? I bought my first pair of Levis 501s, which would become my basic signature pants for the next 40 years, for $8.00 in 1966. During the 1970s I wore flares and during the 80s I wore boot-cut, then in the 1990s and early 2000s I went back to the straight leg.
Eventually, the 501s began to get less comfortable for me (probably old age or something) and I moved over to whatever stretch denim low-rise jeans were on sale. Thankfully, modern stretch denim is nothing like that ugly crap they made in the 60s. Those were awful--with side zips. (Of course, they weren't as sexy as those in the picture because they weren't tight, and we wore white Keds, not stiletto ankle boots!) I mean, really, what's the point of a side zipper? Well, I can imagine... Probably a sexual deterrent since back then only teenagers wore blue jeans.
In the 1970s I also wore OPs (Ocean Pacifics): corduroy pants with long, deep front pockets and flared legs. I'd still wear those if they made them. Then, in the early 1980s, I wore Weeds. Remember them? They were sort of the precursor to Dockers, but were much more comfortable because they hand an elasticized waistband. They also had a completely pointless drawstring. I loved those. Dockers were comfortable, but although they looked great on anyone who was tall and slim, they made everyone else's butt look huge and their legs short and stumpy. And the front pleats didn't do anyone any favors. Front pleats? What were they thinking?
Nowadays I wear sweats at home, and lounge pants. You know the kind. The kind with the Three Stooges, rubber duckies, or Corona labels on them. If I go out I wear my jeans. I've just never found anything I like better. I intend to be buried in my jeans, hopefully Levis 501s--if I can afford them again by then.

8 comments:
No love for overalls? :(
From about 1977-1979 I wore them almost exclusively. I want to get some more!
You know, of course, that they're not as practical for women as they are for men... Kind of a hassle.
Maybe it's a "you gotta be a woman" thing to get it, but...they're still pants and they're not that much harder to get on and off, are they? I mean, I know, men can use the fly and whatnot for the rest room...but that's only for, well, "Option Number One". I certainly don't find them any more cumbersome or time-consuming to put on than any other pair of pants, maybe even less so...they tend to be baggy, so it's easy to pull 'em up, lift the bib, fasten two straps, and you're done! No messing around with a belt or some button that requires a bit of gut-sucking, and so on.
But then, there IS the hazard of shoulder straps dropping into the toilet water!
Yeah, but we still have to nearly completely undress--undo the straps and unbutton the sides. That takes time. Especially if you're drinking beer...
:)
I had some jeans when I was a kid, but they were only for things that might tend to get me and my pants dirty (outdoor cleanup, planting, etc.) I never owned a pair of grown-up jeans until I was over 30. I just didn't "get" the whole jeans thing. I finally joined the band and have been a staunch fan ever since.
The one thing I don't like about jeans is, that due to the bulkiness of the zipper and the denim and a belt buckle, no one can really have a flat tummy while wearing jeans. There is a bump that sticks out no matter how thin you are! Hence, I think, the attempt to introduce the side zipper. It's a pity it didn't catch on. My tummy isn't anywhere close to flat anymore and I could use all the help I can get!!
"Sing the praises of pants!"
(Had to do it,LOL)
[sigh] Signs of aging. I own three pairs of jeans, two of them stretch jeans, and I rarely wear them because they're all uncomfortable.
I sort of have a nostalgic fondness for side-zip jeans. I had a pair when I was six years old. If I still wore jeans I would say I wish I could still get them with side zippers. They were considered more feminine.
Post a Comment